Identity in the age of digital media

The 12 year old who showed me this picture gave me a lot to think about. As part of her Bat Mitzvah (coming of age celebration) preparation she had to write a speech to give to the community. I asked her to make a collage about herself  and she was given the following prompt questions:

  • Who is important to you?
  • What do you care about most?
  • How would your friends describe you?
  • How would you describe yourself?
  • What are you most proud of?
  • What do you like to do do in your spare time?

Her reason for including the picture was that she felt like the answer to “how would your friends describe you” came increasingly from the self she projected online and less so from who she felt she ‘really’ was.

There’s nothing particularly unusual about that statement, the internet is awash with writing about what it means to be ‘real’ online and what the things we say (and don’t say) do to the way people around us understand us. I don’t think this, at least on the surface, a youthful anxiety. What I do think might be different is the simultaneous performance and formation of identity.

Goffman’s theory of audience and backstage (quick guide here) holds up well against the test of time, finding relevance in a time quite far removed from the one in which it was written. Where I think it runs into problems with the question of identity online is with regards to where the ‘essential’ self lies. The suggestion in Goffman’s work is that the backstage is where some greater degree of reality or trueness of self exists. Thinking about whether this is true in the context of online identity provokes the following reactions for me:

  • If the ‘self’ that you experience of others is that which is performed (for instance if a large volume of social interaction takes place online in semi-public spheres), what might that do to someone’s notion of their backstage? Could this mean that the modern self is a performed self?
  • One of the oft-touted values of online community is that anonymity and the variety of spaces available enable people to be someone online in a way that they feel they cannot be offline. In this case the internet becomes a venue for their backstage, and their offline lives are perhaps more of a performance.
  • Young people are increasingly discerning about what they see online and its reality (see recent online storm around Kylie Jenner’s lips…) yet simultaneously participate in creating this modified culture. Filters, photo editing apps, untagging photos etc are all examples of acts of performance in online social spaces that people simultaneously do and complain about.  What is it about the nature of the medium and the interactions it facilitates that might be behind this?
Advertisements

facetime/face time

notes on an exchange

Over the weekend Child x (year 7) complains to Teenager y (year 10) about the lack of wifi access at the activity centre we’re staying in:

we can see a network but we can’t connect, it means we can’t facetime each other”

“if you lift up your head from your screen you can face-time each other without wifi”

I watched this little exchange with amusement. Parents often ask me about their child’s relationship with a given electronic device, namely their inability to be separated from it. The older teenager who made the facetime remark was one such child, his head was never out of his nintendo DS and when that was replaced with an iTouch when he started secondary school the problem got worse. I reminded him of this and asked him what had changed. He responded with the tumblr-esque soundbite, “nothing, I just grew up. Music is better live than on youtube, and people are better in person than through a screen. Once they’re old enough to be able to explore the world beyond their screens as freely as they can do through their screens, they’ll change their minds”.

Hmm…